| Q&A"How do You Deal with the Cross in Witness 
        to Muslims?" 
 Since I first began sharing the gospel with Muslims in North Africa about 
        thirty years ago, I have found that often the moment I mention Jesus' 
        crucifixion, they begin to quote the Qur'an to me in Arabic: "they did 
        not kill him nor did they crucify him, but it appeared so to them. ... 
        But God took him up to Himself" (Sura 4:157-8). But what does that ambiguous 
        little phrase "it appeared so to them" [shubbiha la-hum] mean? It has 
        been the subject of voluminous Muslim speculation over the years. Suffice 
        it to say that the most popular explanation has it that in the last minute 
        confusion someone else [Judas?] was somehow put in Jesus' place, while 
        God spirited Him away to heaven. Usually you're told that this is what 
        Muslims believe, without a hint that it's just conjecture. 
 Actually, the Qur'an is ambiguous on the matter. One passage denies unequivocally 
        that Jesus was ever crucified, but several others might seem to indicate 
        otherwise. In Suras 3:55 and 5:117, God is said to have "taken" Jesus 
        [it's a technical term meaning cause to die], and in 19:33 we find these 
        words on His lips: "Peace be upon me the day I was born and the day I 
        die and the day I shall be raised alive." Muslim exegetes, however, interpret 
        these passages to refer to the Last Day, when it is believed that Christ 
        will return, kill the anti-Christ, break the Cross, and die a natural 
        death! But nowhere does the Qur'an say so clearly.
 
 Is it possible that such passages indicate that, all things considered, 
        the Qur'an actually supports the crucifixion, as some would argue? There 
        may be some truth to it, but it gets us nowhere because of the Qur'an's 
        ambiguity on the subject. One Muslim writer acknowledges a certain "mystery" 
        to the Qur'anic account, but argues: "The denial of the death of Christ 
        is in perfect line with the logic of the Qur'an and with the constant 
        elements of its teaching," which is "the final triumph of faith over the 
        forces of evil and adversity... . In such a perspective the death of Christ 
        would have been a contradiction of the constant doctrine of the Qur'an"; 
        it "would have meant the triumph of his executioners, whereas the Qur'an 
        unquestionably affirms their failure." Here is the crux of the problem: 
        on the basis of the Qur'an's teaching, Muslims assume that the Cross would 
        have meant God's defeat. The crucifixion is one of the most well attested 
        facts of history, but that does not faze most Muslims who go so far as 
        to rewrite history to maintain the "truth" of Islam.
 
 I do not therefore recommend appealing to the Qur'an in support of the 
        crucifixion. It is better lovingly and positively to affirm the biblical 
        witness to the Cross. As Jesus' once did with some Jews (Matt. 22:29) 
        you might tell your friend: "You err, not knowing the Scriptures or the 
        power of God." You might ask why he or she believes God would not let 
        Jesus be put to death when the Qur'an says that the prophets were slain 
        (Suras 2:61; 3:21, 112, 181ff; 4:155). Above all, explain that the "defeat" 
        at the Cross was only apparent; it was just a skirmish, the necessary 
        first step toward winning the war with Satan, sin and death by His resurrection 
        from the dead. Jesus had to die to do that.
  Arab World Ministries (Source)   
 
 
 CBN IS HERE FOR YOU!Are you seeking answers in life? Are you hurting?
 Are you facing a difficult situation?
  A caring friend will be there to pray with you in your time of need. |  |